BIP352: ECDSA verify compare x(R) modulo n to r #1959
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
jonatack
added
Proposed BIP modification
Pending acceptance
Contributor
|
Ping authors, @RubenSomsen, @josibake |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The signer computes r = x(R) mod n, but the verifier compared the affine x-coordinate directly to r. This could incorrectly reject valid signatures when x(R) ≥ n (rare but possible). Update ECPubKey.verify_ecdsa to check (x(R) % n) == r, aligning verification with ECDSA as defined in SEC1/FIPS 186 and matching our signer’s behavior.